At the inaugural CRITgroup meeting in November 2011 the possibility of a collaborative project was raised. After one year of Creating, Reflecting, Investigating and Talking, we recently presented our first collaboration, Creative Whispers.
We are interested in investigating the perceived differences between ‘art’ and ‘craft’, as this has been a feature of our conversations in several meetings. How does the apparent need to ‘label’ oneself as a particular kind of practitioner (a ‘photographer’, a ‘craft worker’, etc.) affect individual practices and how do those descriptions of discipline relate to differing methods of producing work? To get started, we are running three ‘mini projects’, which we will use to pin down and agree a clear research question to inform the next working stages of the project. The idea of these is that by introducing particular boundaries or criteria we will flush out key aspects of our respective practices, which will equip us in our collaborative investigations. The second project is titled Crafting by Committee.
We are interested in investigating the perceived differences between ‘art’ and ‘craft’, as this has been a feature of our conversations in several meetings. How does the apparent need to ‘label’ oneself as a particular kind of practitioner (a ‘photographer’, a ‘craft worker’, etc.) affect individual practices and how do those descriptions of discipline relate to differing methods of producing work? To get started, we are running three ‘mini projects’, which we will use to pin down and agree a clear research question to inform the next working stages of the project. The idea of these is that by introducing particular boundaries or criteria we will flush out key aspects of our respective practices, which will equip us in our collaborative investigations. The second project is titled Crafting by Committee.
Crafting By Committee will be a shorter, three session project taking us up to the end of 2013 in which each collaborator will produce a brief project proposal, situated within their current practice. The rest of the group will act as a panel who will, upon hearing the proposal, specify particular criteria for how the project must progress. The practitioner must then follow these instructions precisely and return to the panel with the outcome. The hope is that we can use these pieces to reflect upon how decision making within different practices can impact upon outcomes but also be an intrinsic part of the creative process. Again, these will be research pieces, starting points for potential development and pieces of work in their own right.
The initial project proposals are recorded below as a precursor to the first stage of Committee Feedback. |
Project Proposal: Christine Wilcox-Baker Cupcake Karma: Annabeth Orton Initial Proposal: James Sharp Initial Proposal: Renate Wendel Collaboration: Shirley and David Hammond Manchester and Water: Kevin Linnane |
Further Information: